At least Intel is putting out heat because the developers are speed crazed and don't know when to stop instead of just putting out heat because it was poorly designed *cough* AMD Mission Statement 2-3 Years Ago *cough*


bling bling

no, they aren't speed crazed. Havent you noticed Intel's chips arent getting any faster? Intel's Fastest processor is 3.8 Ghz, and some of their chips can be overclocked as high aas 4.2-4.5. AMD has a 2.6 Ghz chip, which would outperform a 4 Ghz chip, if Intel had it. These chips can go as high as 3 Ghz and literally spank anything Intel has.

Why do you think Intel is taking the dual core road? What? "Out of steam?", can't get any faster, so you're putting 2 regular 2.8-3.2 Ghz chips into one, hoping two heads are better than one? Yeah, that's what they are doing. Remember the 90nm speed block I was talking about earlier? Intel's chips can't go any faster. Is this due to the fact they put out more heat than the sun, or that their pipeline, which gives them so much speed, is too long? Face it, you own a chip made by a company where both the customer and the company still share the psyche that the higher the number, the better it must be. Wow, you have a 100 Ghz processor. What, It performs on par with a 1 Ghz AMD? AMD's PR numbers aren't just so they can stay in the game, because of their processor's efficiency, they can perform on the same par as an Intel processor of up to 2/3 faster. So get the idea out of your head that your 3.2 Ghz processor beats anything AMD has because their fastest processor is 2.6 Ghz. That would be saying that a Semi truck can beat a Ferrari because it's bigger.